Month: April 2014

Md. Democratic Governor Candidates Announce Debate Details

It’s pretty cool that these governor candidates have already started scheduling public debates for people to attend. They definitely set a precedent that all public officials should follow.

CBS Baltimore

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Three Maryland Democratic candidates for governor are announcing plans for debates before the June primary.

The campaigns for Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown, Attorney General Doug Gansler and Del. Heather Mizeur announced the details Wednesday.

The campaigns say the first debate will take place on May 7 and will be moderated by NBC’s David Gregory. It will be televised in the Washington, D.C., and Hagerstown, Md., markets. Another second debate on June 2 will be televised statewide on Maryland Public Television.

The campaigns have agreed to a radio debate on WOLB-AM moderated by former state Sen. Larry Young. The date for this event has not been set.

The primary is June 24.

(Copyright 2013 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

View original post

Public Debate

I haven’t focused a lot on public debates throughout this blog, and since I’m planning on finishing writing it soon, I wanted to write a post about public debate. Since most of us are not able to be involved in the debate team in high schools or colleges, I think it’s important that people know other ways to be involved in what is probably the most educational and useful activity their is. Thus, it’s important for people to be involved with public debate.

 

Other than the educational value of public debate, the activity has importance in that it involves the community in an issue that is important to them, thus strengthening deliberative democracy. Deliberative democracy is especially important considering how easy it is for citizens to have their rights taken away, thus making it important for people to be express their opinions and have their voices heard.

 

So how do you get involved in public debates? There are a couple ways to do so. First, you should contact your local government offices and see if they have any information. Figure out what the main issues are affecting your community and figure out if someone has organized an event around discussing it. If no one has, you could even organize your own public debate to invite members of the community to discuss the issue. Additionally, if you live in a community with a college close-by, chances are you have access to some kind of debate organization that holds public debates. My school certainly holds numerous public debates each year in which several members of the community show up and participate in what quickly becomes an educational discussion about an issue affecting the community.

 

Since it’s so important and definitely possible to be involved in public debates, I strongly suggest that you get involved.

New research confirms the power of debate to change lives

I thought this was pretty cool– a new research study on the Chicago Urban Debate League conducted by the Journal of Adolescents looked into the connections between joining a high school debate and readiness for college. This study found that debaters are 3.1 times more likely to graduate high school and be prepared for college, and that at-risk students were 72% likely to graduate if they were involved with high school debate, versus the 43% of non-debaters that were likely to graduate. This page has the press release.

Supporting Debate as a Community Member

If you’re a community member who is interested in supporting debate but isn’t currently involved in it, there are a couple things that you could do to support a local debate team. Most colleges and several high schools host public debates where the community is invited to watch and/or participate; going to any of these events is an excellent way to support a team. Additionally, you can contact a local administrator explicitly giving your support for the local debate program in an attempt to give the program some recognition. This could even potentially help the local team acquire more funding. Additionally, you could contact the administrator in charge of the program and express how much you support the team.

 

When community members express their support for debate, the activity is able to thrive and grow. Thus, debate teams definitely appreciate any support that community members give them.

Transitioning Between High School and College Debate

For any of you who are high school debaters that may have stumbled across this blog and are about to do the transition to college debate, there are a couple things you should know.

 

1. Speech times are different– in high school policy debate, speeches are 8 and 5 minutes long. In college, speech times are 9 and 6 minutes long. Additionally, prep time is 10 minutes per debate instead of your normal 8 or 5 minutes.

2. Topics are smaller, but also bigger– the wording of topics are more limited in college (we often have list topics as opposed to broad “x should be done” kind of topics) which limits the amount of ground aff teams have. However, because of the sheer amount of research that college debaters do, there will be a broad amount of affs with numerous different advantages.

3. Find your niche/generics are your friend– while it’s certainly an excellent idea to be more specific and have those arguments prepared, knowing  a core disad or kritik and being prepared to go for it in any round is an especially good idea in college because of the amount of affs that exist. Especially early on in the year when you haven’t predicted all of the affs, having a core set of generic arguments to be able to make is a good idea.

4. Mutually preferred judging– while MPJ already exists on the national circuit, I debated in a circuit that didn’t have this when I was in high school, so I thought I should include a brief explanation of this/why this matters. MPJ allows you to rank each judge in order of preference. When you get paired against another team, the tournament will compare where you have judges ranked and where that team has judges ranked and decide your judge based on that placement. This allows for debaters to get judges who cater more to their style of debate. This also means that you can easily become a more nuanced K or policy debater in college if you/your coaches decide that is a good idea. It also means you generally get judges who you consider to be qualified.

 

There are certainly more differences between high school and college debate. If anyone else thinks of any major ones, feel free to post them in the comments section!

Online Debate Camp

For any of you who might be high school students interested in going to a debate camp, but can’t afford attending one, or can’t travel to one because it’s too far away, the Access Debate Camp is an online debate camp that might be worth checking out. This camp has numerous different lab leaders and instructors who are some of the brightest minds in the community and who are certainly capable of giving you your money’s worth.

 

Information is available here, as well as the link posted above.

Why Debate is Good– Shaping Arguments

This article is by a former debater and rising comedian who has put the skills she’s learned from debating in high school to excellent usage. She indicates that when she was just going into high school, she was constantly argumentative but didn’t really have any direction or form of her arguments, and that joining the debate team helped her out with that (she even indicates that it helped her convince her parents to let her drink in her house). I think this is another skill that is underrepresented as something that debate helps teach– shaping arguments. While most teenagers and young adults are always wanting to argue, they don’t really know how, and they often times present ineffective and useless arguments just to have them. Debating helps teach a person how to formulate a position in an intelligent manner, making their point go across more effectively and efficiently. This in turn helps teach not only the debater how to convey arguments better, but also the person who the debater is arguing with different argument styles and points.